Fawn Hollow Elementary School
375 Fan Hill Rd
Monroe CT, 06468, Fairfield County
Phone: 203-452-5846
Ranking: (86 out of 765, top 11%)*
Type: Regular Primary School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 5
School District: Monroe School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 36 | 35 | 41 | 41 | 35 | 40 | 39 | |||||||
Total Students: | 522 | 523 | 556 | 615 | 530 | 565 | 598 | |||||||
Kindergarten: | 74 | 14.2% | 69 | 13.2% | 79 | 14.2% | 78 | 12.7% | 97 | 18.3% | 99 | 17.5% | 81 | 13.5% |
Grade 1: | 72 | 13.8% | 85 | 16.3% | 76 | 13.7% | 104 | 16.9% | 100 | 18.9% | 82 | 14.5% | 122 | 20.4% |
Grade 2: | 86 | 16.5% | 78 | 14.9% | 105 | 18.9% | 98 | 15.9% | 83 | 15.7% | 124 | 21.9% | 138 | 23.1% |
Grade 3: | 81 | 15.5% | 109 | 20.8% | 95 | 17.1% | 90 | 14.6% | 119 | 22.5% | 141 | 25.0% | 120 | 20.1% |
Grade 4: | 110 | 21.1% | 96 | 18.4% | 83 | 14.9% | 116 | 18.9% | 131 | 24.7% | 119 | 21.1% | 137 | 22.9% |
Grade 5: | 99 | 19.0% | 86 | 16.4% | 118 | 21.2% | 129 | 21.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 281 | 53.8% | 289 | 55.3% | 304 | 54.7% | 338 | 55.0% | 283 | 53.4% | 293 | 51.9% | 308 | 51.5% |
Female: | 241 | 46.2% | 234 | 44.7% | 252 | 45.3% | 277 | 45.0% | 239 | 45.1% | 264 | 46.7% | 286 | 47.8% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.5% |
Asian: | 21 | 4.0% | 18 | 3.4% | 18 | 3.2% | 20 | 3.3% | 20 | 3.8% | 20 | 3.5% | 24 | 4.0% |
Hispanic: | 31 | 5.9% | 29 | 5.5% | 25 | 4.5% | 26 | 4.2% | 8 | 1.5% | 13 | 2.3% | 21 | 3.5% |
Black: | 5 | 1.0% | 7 | 1.3% | 12 | 2.2% | 10 | 1.6% | 13 | 2.5% | 18 | 3.2% | 18 | 3.0% |
White: | 446 | 85.4% | 455 | 87.0% | 492 | 88.5% | 548 | 89.1% | 487 | 91.9% | 512 | 90.6% | 532 | 89.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 17 | 3.3% | 12 | 2.3% | 9 | 1.6% | 11 | 1.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 23 | 4.4% | 21 | 4.0% | 29 | 5.2% | 27 | 4.4% | 15 | 2.8% | 16 | 2.8% | 7 | 1.2% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 9 | 1.7% | 10 | 1.9% | 7 | 1.3% | 14 | 2.3% | 6 | 1.1% | 4 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.60 | 14.88 | 13.58 | 15.09 | 15.12 | 15.20 | 15.40 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
CMT | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 94.2% | 78.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 93.4% | 80.1% |
2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 91.4% | 80.7% |
2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 97.1% | 82.8% |
2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 95% | 83.6% |
2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 97.8% | 84.3% |
2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.7% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 97.6% | 82.7% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 89.9% | 69.2% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 87.4% | 69.3% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 84.2% | 68.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 88.5% | 71.1% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 89.9% | 72.3% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.5% | 74% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 92.8% | 74.5% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 90.0% | 72.4% |
2006 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 95.3% | 81.7% |
2007 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 93% | 82.4% |
2008 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 92% | 82.9% |
2009 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 96.1% | 83.2% |
2010 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 91.9% | 80.3% |
2011 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.6% | 81.1% |
2012 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.3% | 83.2% |
2013 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 95.0% | 80.4% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 90.5% | 80.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 96% | 80.9% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95.1% | 81.5% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 99.6% | 84.6% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 97.6% | 85.2% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 98.2% | 97.9% | 85.2% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 98.2% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 97.1% | 83.8% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 87.5% | 71.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 92.1% | 70.6% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 89% | 69.7% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 95.9% | 74.4% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 89.5% | 72.9% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 98.2% | 96.1% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 95.1% | 78.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 93.7% | 77.6% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 92.2% | 84.2% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.2% | 96.3% | 84.1% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 95.5% | 84.8% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 95.4% | 85% |
2010 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 97.7% | 86.5% |
2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 96.3% | 85.4% |
2012 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 92.7% | 83.7% |
2013 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 95.9% | 83.5% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 98% | 87.6% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 97% | 85.7% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 96.6% | 84.4% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.5% | 75.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 94.8% | 79.7% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.0% | 95.3% | 79.1% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 99.2% | 98.3% | 82.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.5% | 82.4% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 95.5% | 81.7% |
2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 95.7% | 88% |
2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 96.7% | 88.5% |
2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.9% | 87.7% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Fawn Hollow Elementary School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.